Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Angola and the Landmines


I stared at this photograph for a few good minutes before I could quite figure out what was wrong with it. There are the apparent things, like the fact that these women obviously have to walk for a while to get water and that they either live in tents or in ramshackle buildings, but I’ve been looking at photographs like this for a while and now those things don’t stand out as much.

What really stood out was how short the women were. They have normal proportions, so they can’t be little people. When I realized why these women were so small I was shocked.

These women lost their legs in landmines and now they walk on their knees.

Although Angola, the country that these women live in, is “potentially one of Africa’s richest countries” (Salgado), the civil war that plagued the country from 1975 until 2002 has made that potential nearly impossible (Talbot). Over 500,000 people were killed, many of whom were civilians, and this war was backed by the U.S. as an extension of the cold war, with pro and anti communism as the main political ideologies (Hurst).

One of the tactics of the war was to plant landmines. In 2004, there were still over six million landmines scattered all over Angola, with a new incident occurring every four days (“Humanitarian”). This photograph was taken in 1997, when the number of incidents each day was much larger.

I have never heard of the Angolan Civil War. I have never seen so many amputees as I have in Salgado’s photographs. I have never seen so much pain. And I’ll bet that most of you haven’t either.





"Humanitarian News and Analysis." IRINnews. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Feb. 2013.

Hurst, Ryan. "Angolan Civil War (1975-2002) | The Black Past: Remembered and Reclaimed." Angolan Civil War (1975-2002) | The Black Past: Remembered and Reclaimed. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Feb. 2013.

 Salgado, Sebastião. Migrations. New York: Aperture. 226. Print.

Talbot, Ann. "World Socialist Web Site." The Angolan Civil War and US Foreign Policy -. N.p., 13  

         Apr. 2002. Web. 26 Feb. 2013



1 comment:

  1. Wow. I didn't even realize that these women were missing their lower legs until you pointed it out. I think it is interesting how their daily schedule hasn't seemed to change, even with their disability: they are still performing the work that needs to get done. It also makes me think of the medical programs they have in areas like this. The process to repair what was left of their legs after the accident would not, in my opinion, be a pleasant one. The comparison between how a surgery would go and feel in a country like America wouldn't even compare. These women have gone through so much, both physically and emotionally, and are forced to live with that every day.

    ReplyDelete